1 Keep
Equipment and systems that work fine and only need better configuration or preventive maintenance. There's no technical reason to replace them.
Book your free consultation
Short answer: an IT audit reviews your network, security, infrastructure maturity, performance, and the processes technology is slowing down or speeding up, and it ends with an inventory, findings ranked by risk, and a remediation roadmap. You need one when nobody has the full map of your infrastructure, or when you're about to invest in new hardware without knowing whether the real problem is capacity or a bad configuration.
| Deliverable | What it contains | What it's for |
|---|---|---|
| Complete technical inventory | Every device, license, link and system, with useful life and an owner | Knowing what you actually have, not what you assume you have |
| Findings ranked by risk | Every issue classified as critical, important or minor, backed by evidence | Deciding what gets fixed first without arguing over opinion |
| Remediation roadmap | A staged plan with dependencies and estimated timelines | Executing without improvising or stopping operations |
| Cost-efficiency report | What to keep, what to salvage and what to replace, with the reasoning behind each call | Spending where it's actually needed, not where it's scariest |
If the deliverable you're offered is just a list of recommended equipment with prices, it's not an audit — it's a quote in disguise.
A properly done audit is not a shopping catalog. The right order — and the angle that's hardest to accept for whoever sells equipment first — is this:
Equipment and systems that work fine and only need better configuration or preventive maintenance. There's no technical reason to replace them.
Underused or poorly distributed infrastructure: sometimes the capacity you need already exists, just misallocated across sites or workloads.
Configuration changes, segmentation or consolidation that solve the real bottleneck without buying anything new.
Only once these three options are exhausted does investing in new hardware make sense — and it arrives with a business case and a clear priority behind it, not as a reflex to any problem.
It depends on the size of the infrastructure. For a mid-sized company with one or two sites, discovery and analysis take between two and four weeks. The remediation roadmap is delivered at the end, once the diagnosis is complete — not before.
It shouldn't. Discovery is done by observing and documenting what's already running, without touching critical configurations. Any test that carries risk — like forcing a failover or simulating an outage — is scheduled in a controlled window and announced in advance.
It's documented as part of the roadmap, with the technical justification and its priority relative to the other findings. It's never presented as a standalone recommendation for one vendor or model — what you already have gets exhausted first.
Before you approve the next equipment purchase, it's worth knowing whether the problem is capacity or configuration. That answer costs far less than getting it wrong. STI has been auditing and diagnosing infrastructure in Guadalajara for 20 years, with 350+ projects delivered and an Alestra certification. Book a free initial diagnosis — no commitment and no catalog up front.